Food News
12

Food News And Culinary Editorials

Visit our Food News features each day for up-to-date information about everything from recipe contests to food labeling laws, the latest trends, fads and even food recalls.  

General Food News

All news

Fat, Salt and Helmet Laws....

5/14/2010 11:25:16 AM

Throw out your salt shaker, the Feds are in town.

We just learned the FDA wants to legislate how much salt a food manufacturer can include in their product.   At first thought I said YA HUH.. But as I contemplated further I wondered.. so what happens when they legislate the sugar in my coffee,  my evening glass of wine or that pat of butter I put on my toast?

I think the problem is that the government would rather apply a Bandaid to a problem than elicit a cure.  They seem to prefer to pass another law than to spend money on boosting nutritional education.  If these processed foods were a smaller part of our diet (by making educated choices) then the excess sodium would not even be an issue.  The role of the FDA in the past has always been to see that the consumer is provided the necessary information (food labeling laws) to make intelligent, safe, buying decisions.  That's a service most of us can appreciate.  The proposed sodium restriction law puts the FDA in a position to start making life choices for you.  

As The Feds Begin Footing The Bill - You'll Eat What They Say To Eat

Frankly I see this just as the beginning.  Remember the helmet law argument?  The government says that the tax payers end up paying for people who get hurt and can't afford the long term care of brain damaged people. Based on that, we legislate your safety. 

Now that the government has gone into the health care business they will continually have a bigger and bigger stake in how we manage our health.  I suspect this salt legislation is the first of a long list of culinary choices the feds will make "for your own good".  The assumption is that you and I are too stupid or misinformed to make proper nutritional decisions for ourselves.  Let us not forget the quote from San Francisco's Mayor Gavin Newsom regarding taxation of sweetened soft drinks ""It makes sense for the government to help people to make the right choices".   And by "help" he means to "force" your choices. 

Remember when your parents said "as long as you are living in our house you live by our rules"?  That's what the government is doing now.  As long as they are footing the bill for your health care then you will eat what they they say to eat, like it or not.

I know some of you are probably saying.. well.. salt really is bad for us.. We'll that's not exactly true either.  Only people with hypertension really need to restrict sodium intake.  This issue is really not about salt, healthy or not healthy.  It's about the government trying to make our choices for us, make us dependent, and easier to control and manipulate.  Remember, today it's salt.  What's next?  Maybe they should regulate use of dairy products, fat is certainly a villain. Heaven only knows alcoholism is a serious problem in the U.S. surely they should restrict the sale of your bottle of beer or wine.   And just about everyone knows the evils of sugar.  Maybe they should shut down the candy industry in the U.S. or outlaw desserts.

I for one believe that most of us would benefit from better nutrition.  I think avoiding processed and packaged foods will improve your nutrition.  I think we shouldn't drink so many soft drinks.  I can certainly understand that we need to keep a check on excess fat intake,  avoid abuse of alcoholic beverages.  And who could argue that eating more fresh fruits, vegetables, meats, fish and whole grains is the ticket to good health.   Finally I believe that we can accomplish this, over time, by being role models for our children and teaching healthy eating habits.  I believe we don't need our government to stock our refrigerators for us.   America, Land Of The Free, well, it used to be. 

The Sleuth

Facebook Twitter DZone It! Digg It! StumbleUpon Technorati Del.icio.us NewsVine Reddit Blinklist Add diigo bookmark

Comments 3

  1. Allen

    Friday May 14, 2010 1:12PM

    "DITTO"

    Way to go Sleuth!!

  2. Dave Oesterreich

    Saturday May 15, 2010 5:05PM

    You said, "I know some of you are probably saying.. well.. salt really is bad for us.. We'll that's not exactly true either.  Only people with hypertension really need to restrict sodium intake. "

    Well, THAT is not exactly true, either.  Not everyone with hypertension is particularly sensitive to sodium, which is what you're really talking about when you talk about dietary salt.  Only maybe a third of the population (even with hypertension) needs to restrict sodium intake. 

  3. Dave Oesterreich

    Saturday May 15, 2010 5:18PM

    You said: "the FDA wants to legislate how much salt a food manufacturer can include in their product.   *** I wondered.. so what happens when they legislate the sugar in my coffee,  my evening glass of wine or that pat of butter I put on my toast?"

    Different animal.  The FDA is required and is able to police food producers (up to a point), and that's where the concern (if any) and argument properly belongs.

    But to throw our private behavior--the sugar in our coffee, the pat of butter on our toast--into the discussion is a fallacious argument, because that home, personal addition is not only not in the proper bailiwick of the FDA but not even possible for them to police.  It's an improper appeal to emotional reaction on the reader's part.  And the evening glass of wine?  Our society has been through THAT effort maybe seventy years ago, and Prohibition was not only undesirable but was found unenforceable, so it was rejected.  Another fallacious and irrelevant argument thrown into the mix.  Shame on ya!

Post a comment

  1. Formatting options
       
     
     
     
     
       

 
What's Coming Up Next